In the previous post, I discussed about 4 Portuguese tombstones in the Santa Cruz Cathedral of Fort Cochin. They are not the only tombstones unearthed from seabed in the late 1920s at the time of dredging the backwaters of inner Cochin harbour. According to archaeological reports from the early to mid-1930s, at least 13 tombstones were recovered, out of which 4 are in the Santa Cruz Cathedral today. The remaining were shifted to a museum at Thrissur somewhere around the early 1930s. It should be noted that the museum also has two additional Portuguese tombstones from Kodungallur area, so a total of 11 grave markers are conserved in this site today. Unfortunately, most tombstones lack a date. In fact, there is only one tombstone that has a proper date assigned to the deceased. The grave monuments are arranged in the museum courtyard exposed under open-air conditions. All except one gravestone are placed horizontally on the ground. The only vertically mounted monument in the collection is from Kodungallur, which has gained wide publicity after Rafael Moreira-a historian at the New University of Lisbon deciphered the script in 2012 and proposed a connection to Christopher Columbus.
Thrissur District Heritage Museum (former Kollemkode Palace)The yellow arrowhead marks the position of the tombstones
In this post, I will discuss about the 9 Portuguese tombstones from Cochin that are preserved in the Mural Art Museum, Kollemkode Palace, Thrissur. The 2 Kodungallur tombstones will be covered in the next post. Not all the gravestones are in good condition, some are broken to pieces or heavily overgrown with moss and covered with mud, so that the inscriptions are barely legible. The museum staff are of the opinion that no historical records or studies on the inscriptions have survived, so their identity remain anonymous. This is, however, not the case, as at least two archaeological reports from early to mid-1930s have details of the aforementioned inscriptions. The first report is for the year 1930-31, which has reproduced, in full, the 12 Portuguese epitaphs from Cochin along with their English translations (remember 4 out of them are in Santa Cruz Cathedral). The other report is for 1935-36, which has only a rough translation of 8 Cochin inscriptions, but it graciously provides fine sketches of all the tombstones with their Portuguese inscriptions. More recently, Roberts and Chekkutty (Malabar II Christian Memorials, 2017) have come up with 6 names, of which only 4 are from Cochin, one is from Kodungallur, and the last one whose current location is unknown. Among the lists, Roberts and Chekkutty (2017) is the least detailed and accurate inventory for the Cochin tombstones, but it has the Kodungallur tombstone of Columbus-fame addressed in much detail. In the blog, I will be depending more on the Archaeological Report (1930-31), as the translations given in this document by Fr. Godhinho are more faithful to the original Portuguese inscriptions.
Details of the Portuguese Tombstones from Cochin as listed in the Inventories
An Overview of the Portuguese Tombstones in the Courtyard of Mural Art Museum, Thrissur.
1-9: Tombstones from Cochin; 10 and 11-Tombstones from Kodungallur. It was a rainy September morning when I first made photographs of the tombstones, so I had to return a few months later when the weather was warm and sunny. However, when I compared both sets, I realized that the tombstones clicked under wet weather came better and sharper, and there was no interference of any dark shades. Nevertheless, I will use both images here for a better comparison, In all paired photographs uploaded below, the images on the left side are from September, and the right side are from December, 2022, unless mentioned separately.
1) Antonio Raposo (3-lined Inscription)See that in the original inscription, the first name is Amtonio.
2) Isabel M. B. (4-lined Inscription)
3) P. Vas of Figueroa and his wife Felipa of Vascancello (9-lined Inscription)
4) Brirs Laurenco Da’Costa (10-lined Inscription)
In the epitaph, he is identified as a Knight and Captain of Nagappatam and of Ushendratur-from the city of FLK (Archaeological Report,1930-31).
5) Iorze or Jorge Fernandez (d. 22 December, 1565 or 1665) (7-lined Inscription)
Enlarged Views of the Inscription
In the 1930-31 report, the last words in the epitaph, "65 ANOS" is taken as his age at the time of death, i.e 65 years; whereas in the 1935-36 report, the number is interpreted as the year of his death, namely 1565, which seems more likely to be the case.
6) Heitor Lopes Pedepata (9-lined Inscription)-died in the era of years.
7) Manoel Mansias/Mancias and wife D. Maria Da Ravio (9-lined Inscription)
Enlarged Views of the Coat of Arms
In the Coat of Arms is a small plant with the head of a dog-like animal on the four corners (Archaeological Report, 1935-36)
Enlarged Views of the Inscription
8) Francis Roiz (d. 27 October, 1600) (4-lined Inscription)
A Sketch of the Epitaph Published in 1937 and Enlarged Views of the Coat of Arms.
The photographs are taken in September (upper-right) and December (lower-right), 2022. The unique feature of this tombstone is the likeness of a skull and crossbones on the 'Coat of Arms'. The sketch of 1937 clearly depicts the motif. Today, however, the tombstone has thick layer of moss coating over the surface making the inscriptions quite illegible, though you can read the name Francisco on the upper right corner. The skull and crossbones can also be identified despite the thick overgrowth-see the lower photograph on the right side. This is also the only tombstone in the lot where the date of death is clearly mentioned-27th October, 1600. Strangely, Roberts and Chekkutty (2017) for some reason dates the tombstone to c. 1565. Some historians believe that this motif of skull and cross-bones are the earliest image of Jolly Rogger (the symbol of pirate flag), because in Europe the first recorded appearance of the symbol is from 1693 only (see also Roberts and Chekkutty, 2017).
9) Unidentified Marble Tombstone & its Sketch Published in 1937 when the structure was intact (No Inscription)
Photograph taken in December, 2022. In the archaeological report for the year 1935-36 we get an important information regarding this particular tombstone. If the report is to be believed, this tombstone made of marble had broken into pieces before it was removed to the Museum. Furthermore, the letters on this tomb were so illegible that nothing could be made out of them, but the 6 rib bones and the creepers carved around them in relief, with a star above, formed an ornamental design to the stone. Today, broken pieces of the tombstone lie scattered in the museum garden, the creepers and the star can still be traced, but the rib bone motifs have disappeared. Luckily, we have a sketch of the intact tombstone in the same report, and you can observe that there are no inscriptions visible (see above, upper right image).
Broken Fragments of the Marble Tombstone Lying Scattered in the Museum Courtyard
All photographs are taken in December, 2022.
No comments:
Post a Comment